Petitioners who have not retained legal advice often find themselves lost in a legal maze from which they are unable to find a way out. This is especially common in cases where the petitioner has not enlisted the aid of a competent Immigration Attorney. In asylum cases, that could mean that some may not have adequate time to build their case.Ĭases can sometimes be delayed because information on an asylum application is incomplete on insufficient. That means that although the backlog should be reduced, at least some cases may not receive the amount of attention they deserve. While there is an axiom that says that the amount of work expands to fill the time allotted, the polar position is that achieving a specified amount of work within a defined period diminishes the scrutiny and quality of the work. However, sometimes solving one problem creates another. Mandating the number of cases to be fully adjudicated should reduce the backlog.

The anticipated benefit of the Attorney General’s directive is obvious. Judges’ annual performance reviews would include a comparison of their actual “production” versus the 700-case objective.

With immigration reform hung up in Congress, the number of observers predicting bureaucratic reformation seems to have been increasing over the first half of the 2018 Fiscal Year.Īttorney General Jeff Sessions appears to be ready to institute reforms specifically intended to speed up the processing of asylum applications by placing a quota for case closures on each Immigration Judge. No matter what position a person takes on the debate in general, however, nearly everyone would agree that the process takes far too long.įrom time to time we have discussed the backlog in processing EB-5 and other visa applications, but the backlog in processing asylum cases is just as problematic.

In fact, it seems to be a daily matter of debate. immigration system is a mess is a matter of debate.

Viber update got rid of backlog